Head to head

Email Bump vs SendGrid

SendGrid meters emails and sells marketing as a second product. We meter contacts and include both. It also operates at a scale we don't, which matters more than the pricing for some buyers.

Nine rows below, including the three where SendGrid wins outright.

9 rows Checked 2 August 2026

The short version

Which one you want, in three sentences

Pick SendGrid if you're sending at enterprise volume, if you already buy Twilio, or if procurement wants a vendor with an SLA and a compliance pack ready to go.

Pick Email Bump if you'd be buying both the Email API and Marketing Campaigns, or if you want a published price and a free tier that doesn't expire after 60 days.

Pick neither if support is the thing you're optimising for, which is Postmark, or if price is, which is Amazon SES.

Line by line

9 differences that matter

SendGrid's column comes from their published pricing and documentation on 2 August 2026.

SendGrid

Email Bump

Pricing model

Priced on emails; Marketing Campaigns is a separate contact-priced product.

Priced on contacts, one plan. Campaigns and the API share it.

Free plan

None — a 60-day trial at 100 emails a day.

5,000 contacts and 5,000 emails a month, permanently.

Pricing transparency

Essentials from $19.95/mo; higher tiers aren't published as a static table.

A published ladder: $19 at 10,000 contacts, $29 at 25,000, $99 at 100,000.

Marketing email

A separate product with its own pricing.

Campaigns, live segments and flows on the same plan.

Scale

Enterprise volumes, with SLAs and compliance paperwork.

Fine for most products; not an enterprise procurement story yet.

SDKs

Broad official SDK coverage and a very large integration base.

An HTTP API and a CLI. No language SDKs.

Inbound email

Inbound Parse is a long-standing feature.

Included — receive, parse, download attachments and forward.

Data region

United States, with EU options on enterprise agreements.

United States only, on Amazon SES.

Agent surface

A REST API and client libraries.

CLI, an MCP server with 29 tools, and agent skills. An agent can create the account, verify the address and send without a browser.

Against us

Three places SendGrid is the better choice

Enterprise scale and paperwork. SLAs, compliance documentation, a Twilio contract and volumes far beyond what a SaaS plan usually sells. If procurement is part of your decision, they have a story ready and we don't.

SDK and integration coverage. Official libraries across the major languages and a decade of accumulated integrations. We have an HTTP API and a CLI, which is fine until you wanted `npm install`.

Twilio on one contract. If you already send SMS or run voice through Twilio, having email on the same bill and the same account is a real operational simplification.

FAQ

Email Bump vs SendGrid, asked and answered

Is Email Bump cheaper than SendGrid?

For anything that sends both marketing and transactional, yes — SendGrid bills those as two products and we bill one contact-priced plan.

For pure transactional volume at enterprise scale, SendGrid's rates and contract terms will beat ours, and Amazon SES beats both.

How hard is it to migrate from SendGrid?

The send call is a rename and a base URL, since our fields are the common from/to/subject/html/text shape. If you're using the official SendGrid SDK, you'd swap it for a plain HTTP call.

Then the usual work: re-verify sending domains with new DKIM records, import your suppression list before the first send, repoint webhooks, and warm up if you were on a dedicated IP.

Do you have official SDKs?

No. An HTTP API, SMTP, a CLI and an MCP server. If a maintained client library in your language is a requirement, Resend has thirteen and SendGrid has most of the majors.

Try it against your own list

Import a segment and compare

5,000 contacts and 5,000 emails free. Run one campaign through both and let the delivery and click numbers decide.

Start free Read the API docs