Head to head

Email Bump vs Resend

Both send developer email over a small HTTP API. The difference is what happens when you also have a list: Resend prices transactional volume and marketing contacts as two plans, and we price contacts once.

Fourteen rows below, including the four where Resend is the better answer. We wrote those first, because a comparison page that never concedes anything isn't a comparison.

14 rows Checked 2 August 2026
The short version

Which one you want, in three sentences

Pick Resend if your sending is purely transactional, you want an official SDK in your language, and you have no marketing list to pay for. Their model fits that shape cleanly and react-email is a genuinely nice way to write templates.

Pick Email Bump if you're paying twice — once for the API, again for the newsletter — or if you want the account to be drivable by a script or an agent rather than a dashboard.

Pick neither if you need European data residency. We're both US-only, and the main comparison names the European providers that aren't.

Line by line

Fourteen differences that matter

Resend's column comes from their published pricing and documentation on 2 August 2026.

 
Resend
Email Bump
Pricing model
Two plans. Transactional is priced on emails sent and received; marketing is priced on contacts.
One plan, priced on contacts. Sending is uncapped under fair use.
Free plan
3,000 emails/mo but capped at 100 a day, 1 sending domain. Marketing free is a separate 1,000 contacts.
5,000 contacts and 5,000 emails/mo, no daily cap, unlimited domains and seats. Marketing footers carry a 'Powered by Email Bump' badge.
25,000 contacts + 50,000 emails/mo
$200/mo — $180 for the contact plan plus $20 for the volume plan.
$29/mo, both included.
Marketing campaigns
Broadcasts, on the separate contact-priced marketing plan.
Campaigns, segments and the editor on the same plan as the API.
Automations
10,000 automation runs a month included on Free and Pro; metered beyond that.
Flows with triggers, waits and branches. No per-run meter.
Sending domains
1 on Free, 10 on Pro, 1,000 on Scale.
Unlimited on every plan, including free.
Message log retention
30 days on every plan, including Scale.
Not tiered by plan — the free plan sees the same history as the top one.
SMTP
Yes, on smtp.resend.com with the API key as the password.
Yes, same key as the API, and the sends land in the same log.
Inbound email
Yes — receiving domains parsed and delivered to your webhook.
Yes — inbound messages, attachments and forwarding, over API or CLI.
Official SDKs
13 languages, from Node and Python to Rust and .NET, plus a CLI.
HTTP API and a CLI. No language SDKs — you call it with your HTTP client.
Agent surface
SDKs and a CLI aimed at developers.
CLI, an MCP server with 29 tools, and agent skills. An agent can create the account, verify the address and send, with no browser at any point.
Dedicated IP
$30/mo add-on, for Scale customers over 3,000 emails a day.
Add-on, provisioned once volume justifies it.
Data region
United States.
United States, on Amazon SES. No EU region.
Open source
react-email, their template library, is open source. The platform isn't.
No. Nothing here is open source or self-hostable.
Against us

Four places Resend is the better choice

Official SDKs. Thirteen languages with typed clients and a maintained release cadence. We have an HTTP API and a CLI. If your team's definition of a good integration starts with a package install, that's a real gap and pretending otherwise would waste your afternoon.

Track record. Resend has been the default recommendation in this category for years, with the volume and the public incident history that comes with it. We're newer. Deliverability claims are worth exactly as much as the history behind them.

react-email. Their open-source template library is the nicest way to write email in React, and it isn't locked to their platform — it compiles to HTML you can post to us. Keep it either way.

Pure transactional shape. If you send 200,000 password resets a month and have no marketing list at all, paying for contacts you don't have is the wrong model. Resend's volume pricing — or Amazon SES, at $0.16 per 1,000 — fits that better than we do.

Migration

The code change is a base URL

We deliberately took Resend's field names. Porting a send is not supposed to be interesting.

Beforeapi.resend.com
// Resend
await fetch("https://api.resend.com/emails", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: {
    Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.RESEND_API_KEY}`,
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
  },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    from: "Acme <orders@acme.com>",
    to: "jamie@example.com",
    subject: "Your order has shipped",
    html: "<h1>On the way</h1>",
  }),
})
Afteremailbump.com
// Email Bump
await fetch("https://emailbump.com/api/v1/emails", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: {
    Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.EMAILBUMP_API_KEY}`,
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
  },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    from: "Acme <orders@acme.com>",
    to: "jamie@example.com",
    subject: "Your order has shipped",
    html: "<h1>On the way</h1>",
  }),
})
  • from, to, subject, html, text, reply_to, attachments and scheduled_at all keep their names.
  • A one-element array for to is accepted, so ported clients don't need editing.
  • One recipient per call. There's no cc or bcc on the API — send those over SMTP with the same key.
  • The response id works with GET /v1/emails/{id}, which returns the delivery, open, click and bounce events.
The difference nobody else has

An account an agent can actually run

Every email platform has an API, so every email platform claims an agent can use it. In practice the agent gets three steps in and hits a browser: sign up here, click this verification link, paste this key from the dashboard.

We removed those steps. An agent can create the account from an email address — no password, no browser — and confirm it with the six-character code we email, which arrives in the conversation rather than behind a login. From there the CLI and the MCP server cover the same surface as the API: domains, contacts, events, campaigns, flows, inbound, sending.

The guardrails matter as much as the coverage. Sending a campaign is confirm-gated and shows a preview first. Deleting takes an explicit flag. Subscribing a contact carries a consent warning, because an agent that cheerfully re-subscribes a list is a deliverability incident with good intentions.

FAQ

Email Bump vs Resend, asked and answered

Is Email Bump cheaper than Resend?

For anything that sends both product email and campaigns, substantially. Resend prices transactional volume and marketing contacts as two plans, so 25,000 subscribers and 50,000 monthly emails is $180 plus $20. The same shape is $29/mo here because contacts are the only thing metered.

For pure transactional sending with no marketing list, the gap narrows and Amazon SES beats us both — $0.16 per 1,000 emails, if you're happy to build the rest yourself.

How do I migrate from Resend to Email Bump?

Change the base URL and the key. Our send endpoint takes the same field names — from, to, subject, html, text, reply_to, attachments, scheduled_at — and accepts a one-element array for to, so ported clients don't need editing.

Then do the parts that are the same wherever you go: re-verify your sending domains with the DKIM records we return, import your suppression list before the first send, and point webhooks at the new signing secret.

What does Resend do better?

Official SDKs in thirteen languages against our HTTP API and CLI — if you want `npm install` and a typed client, that's a real difference. A longer public track record. react-email, which is genuinely good and which you can keep using with us since we accept the HTML it produces.

And if your sending is purely transactional with no list behind it, Resend's model fits that shape more neatly than paying for contacts you don't have.

Does Email Bump have an EU region?

No. Sending is United States only, on Amazon SES in us-east-1. If European data residency is a hard requirement, AhaSend, Scaleway TEM or Mailgun's EU region are the honest recommendations, and the main comparison page covers each.

Can an AI agent run Email Bump?

That's the part with no equivalent at Resend. The CLI covers the same surface as the API and prints JSON. The MCP server exposes 29 tools to Claude Code, Claude Desktop and Cursor, with confirmation gates on anything that reaches real people. An agent can create the account from an email address, enter the six-character verification code, add and verify a domain, and send — without a browser at any point.

Try it against your own traffic

Point one endpoint at us and compare

5,000 contacts and 5,000 emails free. Send your lowest-stakes traffic through both for a week and let the delivery numbers decide.