Head to head

Email Bump vs Mailtrap

Mailtrap meters emails and tiers log retention. We meter contacts and don't tier retention. And Mailtrap has a staging sandbox we simply don't offer.

Eight rows below, including the two where Mailtrap wins outright.

8 rows Checked 2 August 2026
The short version

Which one you want, in three sentences

Pick Mailtrap if the testing sandbox is why you're there. Catching staging email before it reaches a real customer is a genuinely valuable thing that nothing on this page replicates, including us.

Pick Email Bump if five days of logs isn't enough, or if you also send campaigns and would rather not run a second platform for them.

Pick both which is what plenty of teams do — Mailtrap for staging, someone else for production. The free testing tier makes that cheap.

Line by line

8 differences that matter

Mailtrap's column comes from their published pricing and documentation on 2 August 2026.

 
Mailtrap
Email Bump
Pricing model
Priced on emails across four tiers.
Priced on contacts, one plan. Sending is uncapped under fair use.
Log retention
3 days free, 5 on Basic, 15 on Business, 30 on Enterprise.
Not tiered by plan — the free plan sees the same history as the top one.
Free plan
4,000 emails a month, capped at 150 a day, 1 domain, 1 user.
5,000 contacts and 5,000 emails a month, no daily cap, unlimited domains and seats.
Testing sandbox
Yes — the flagship feature, and unrivalled here.
None.
Marketing email
A bulk stream on Business and above; no journey builder.
Campaigns, live segments and flows on the same plan as the API.
Dedicated IP
On Business, from $85/mo.
Add-on, provisioned once volume justifies it.
Inbound email
Not the focus of the platform.
Included — receive, parse, download attachments and forward.
Agent surface
A REST API and client libraries.
CLI, an MCP server with 29 tools, and agent skills.
Against us

Two places Mailtrap is the better choice

The staging sandbox. Point your development environment at Mailtrap and every email your app tries to send lands in a fake inbox you can inspect instead of a real customer's. We have nothing like it, and neither does anyone else on this page.

Bounce debugging depth. Bounce categorisation and per-domain diagnostics are unusually good, which is what you'd expect from a company that started by helping developers debug email.

FAQ

Email Bump vs Mailtrap, asked and answered

Do you have a testing sandbox?

No. If you need to catch staging email before it reaches real inboxes, Mailtrap is the right tool and we're not a replacement for that part.

Plenty of teams keep Mailtrap on staging and send production mail somewhere else — that's a reasonable setup, not a compromise.

How long do you keep logs?

Retention isn't a plan feature here — the free plan sees the same history as the top one. Mailtrap keeps 3 days on free and 5 on Basic.

That difference shows up the first time someone asks about an email from last week.

Is Email Bump cheaper than Mailtrap?

For anything that also sends marketing, yes — Mailtrap's bulk stream needs Business at $85/mo, and here campaigns are on the same plan as the API from $19/mo.

For pure transactional at low volume, Basic at $15/mo is competitive.

Try it against your own list

Import a segment and compare

5,000 contacts and 5,000 emails free. Run one campaign through both and let the delivery and click numbers decide.