Investigate before sending
Words are evidence,
not a spam verdict.
Inspect the complete message for risky combinations and exact evidence without pretending a keyword list can predict inbox placement.
- Plain text + HTML
- Exact evidence
- Local analysis
No configured risk patterns were highlighted.
Read each finding in context, then validate the complete compiled message and sending system.
Claims and presentation
Visible URLs
0 exclamation marks
Context can make a phrase accurate and appropriate. Absence of matches does not prove consent, authentication, reputation, compliance, or inbox placement.
No highlighted patterns found.
This is not a clean certificate. Review identity, consent, authentication, unsubscribe behavior, claims, compiled HTML, links, and receiver feedback.
Of cased letters
0 missing alt
Context review only
Directional detection
Export the exact draft, disclosed methodology, metrics, findings, and limitations.
No public list of forbidden words can predict placement.
Filtering systems can evaluate authentication, IP and domain reputation, complaint history, recipient behavior, headers, URLs, message structure, content, and combinations of signals. A legitimate promotion can accurately say “free shipping.” A deceptive message can avoid every phrase in a static list.
This tool therefore identifies exact review evidence. Its index represents how much operator attention the draft needs under this disclosed ruleset—not the probability that Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, an enterprise gateway, or SpamAssassin will classify it as spam.
Specific truth is a stronger rewrite than euphemism.
Replace with the actual deadline, including date, time, and zone.
State the measurable result, basis, audience, and material conditions.
Name what the recipient will review and where the link leads.
Do not merely swap a flagged phrase for a synonym. If the underlying claim, pressure, or identity is misleading, the message remains misleading.
Link language and link destination should agree.
HTML mode extracts anchors, image attributes, hidden elements, scripts, forms, iframes, shortener hosts, apparent tracking pixels, and visible-URL mismatches. A hidden element can be a legitimate preheader; a tracking pixel can be ordinary analytics. Both still belong in the evidence record.
Google's sender guidance says links should be visible and easy to understand so recipients know what to expect. Test the provider-compiled email because redirect and tracking systems can rewrite destinations after authoring.
A text scan cannot certify commercial-email compliance.
For marketing mode, the tool checks for visible opt-out language and a directional postal-address pattern. It cannot verify whether headers implement RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe, whether an address is valid, whether an opt-out works, or which jurisdiction applies.
In the United States, the FTC's CAN-SPAM guidance requires accurate headers, non-deceptive subjects, ad identification, a valid physical postal address, a clear opt-out method, and timely honoring of opt-outs. Other countries and states can impose different or additional consent and privacy rules.
Fix the message system, not just the highlighted words.
- Confirm recipient expectation.
Document how and why this audience expects this message type.
- Validate identity and claims.
Make the sender recognizable and substantiate every material promise.
- Inspect the compiled artifact.
Review links, headers, authentication, HTML, plain text, and unsubscribe behavior after provider processing.
- Send a controlled test.
Use representative inboxes and preserve authentication and rendering evidence.
- Monitor receiver feedback.
Complaints, bounces, deferrals, and provider reputation are stronger operational signals than a word score.
Spam-language checker FAQ.
Can I use the word “free”?+
Yes, when the offer is truthful and material conditions are clear. A word alone does not determine placement. Review the complete claim, recipient expectation, identity, links, and sender reputation.
Does a zero review index mean inbox placement?+
No. It means this local ruleset did not highlight configured patterns. It does not inspect consent, live authentication, reputation, complaint history, DNS, or receiver-specific classification.
Is this SpamAssassin?+
No. It does not run Apache SpamAssassin or copy its current rule scores. SpamAssassin uses configurable header, body, URI, network, statistical, and meta tests. This browser tool is an editorial and structural review.
Why is a hidden element flagged?+
Hidden HTML can be legitimate preview text, but Google also warns against deceptive hidden content. The tool records it for context rather than automatically calling it abusive.
Can this check CAN-SPAM compliance?+
No. It offers directional reminders in marketing mode. Legal classification, jurisdiction, header accuracy, opt-out operation, address validity, and consent require broader review.
Should I rewrite every match?+
No. Verify context first. Accurate deadlines and supportable claims can remain. Focus on truth, specificity, recognizable identity, recipient expectation, and clear destinations.
Build wanted email with the operational evidence attached.
Email Bump connects content, audiences, authentication, sending, and receiver feedback.